Chapter outlines
Maternal Physiological Changes during Pregnancy |
Blood volume changes |
Cardiovascular system changes |
Blood pressure changes |
Changes during labor and delivery |
Fluid Therapy in Hyperemesis Gravidarum |
Management |
- Indications of IV fluids |
- Outpatient vs. inpatient IV hydration |
- Selection of IV fluids |
- Role of dextrose solutions |
Fluid therapy during Normal Labor and Vaginal Delivery |
Oral liquid intake |
Oral solid food intake |
Parenteral IV fluids in normal labor |
- Indications of IV fluids |
- Type and volume of IV fluids |
Preoperative Oral Intake |
Liquid intake |
Solid food intake |
During pregnancy, delivery, and in the postpartum period, administration of IV fluids may be required. It is essential to provide appropriate and timely fluid management whenever needed. This chapter aims to provide a basic understanding of the physiological changes that occur in the mother during pregnancy, as well as guidelines for fluid management in the cases of hyperemesis gravidarum and normal delivery.
MATERNAL PHYSIOLOGICAL CHANGES DURING PREGNANCY
Many physiological hemodynamic changes occur during pregnancy, starting just after conception and resolving within six weeks of delivery. An increase in weight gain during pregnancy is attributable to an increased size of the gravid uterus and breasts and an increase in blood volume and extravascular extracellular fluid [1]. Pregnancy-induced hemodynamic and cardiovascular changes ensure optimal growth and development of the fetus, and it also helps in the prevention of blood loss during delivery.
It is essential to understand changes in the circulatory system during pregnancy, such as an increase in cardiac output, retention of sodium and water leading to an expansion of blood volume, and a reduction in systemic vascular resistance and blood pressure. These physiological changes can significantly impact fluid management in pregnant patients, so understanding these changes can help in planning for fluid management in pregnant patients more efficiently.
BLOOD VOLUME CHANGES
Maternal plasma volume and red blood cell increase as early as the fourth week of pregnancy and peak at 28 to 34 weeks of gestation. During pregnancy, there is a retention of 900 to 1000 mEq of sodium and 6 to 8 liters of total body water, causing the expansion of total body volume [2–4].
The increased blood volume during pregnancy helps the body to meet the increased circulatory needs of the fetoplacental unit, which are necessary to sustain the pregnancy. This increased blood volume also allows most women to tolerate significant blood loss during childbirth.
The maternal plasma volume increases by 40% to 50% during pregnancy. In comparison, the red cell volume only increases by 15% to 20%, resulting in hemodilution and a condition known as physiological anemia of pregnancy or relative anemia [5, 6].
CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM CHANGES
During pregnancy, cardiac output increases by 30% to 40%. The maximum increase usually occurs around 28–30 weeks of gestation [7]. This increase is due to both increased stroke volume and heart rate.
BLOOD PRESSURE CHANGES
Reduced systemic vascular resistance leads to a fall in blood pressure (BP) during pregnancy. The BP typically falls early in gestation and is usually 10 mmHg below baseline in the second trimester [2]. However, in the third trimester of pregnancy, systemic vascular resistance gradually increases, leading to a slow increase in blood pressure reaching nonpregnant levels by the end of the pregnancy [8].
CHANGES DURING LABOR AND DELIVERY
During labor and delivery, significant hemodynamic changes occur due to anxiety, exertion, pain, uterine contractions, uterine involution, and bleeding. During the first stage of labor, each uterine contraction displaces about 300 to 500 ml of blood into the general circulation and increases central blood volume by as much as 500 ml. As blood volume increases, the stroke volume of the heart also increases, leading to a 50% increase in cardiac output with each contraction.
In addition, maternal pushing efforts in the second stage of labor can further increase cardiac output. Immediately postpartum, cardiac output increases to 80 percent above pre-labor values due to significant autotransfusion associated with uterine involution.
Thus, the cardiac output can increase to 75% above its baseline level during labor and delivery. An increase in blood volume and cardiac output protects the mother from average blood loss of delivery (300–400 ml for a vaginal delivery and 500–800 ml for a cesarean section).
FLUID THERAPY IN HYPEREMESIS GRAVIDARUM
INTRODUCTION
Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) is the most frequent problem in the first trimester of pregnancy, which affects 50%–90% of all pregnant women [9, 10]. These symptoms are worse in the morning (but often persist throughout the day) and are usually limited to the first trimester of pregnancy.
Hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) is a severe form of nausea and vomiting that affects a small percentage of pregnant women, ranging from 0.3% to 3%. It can lead to significant weight loss, dehydration, ketoacidosis, hypokalemic metabolic alkalosis from the loss of gastric hydrochloric acid, and nutritional deficiencies [11–15].
Two serious nutritional deficiencies reported with hyperemesis in pregnancy are vitamin B1 (thiamine) deficiency (which can cause Wernicke’s encephalopathy) and vitamin K+ deficiency (which can cause maternal coagulopathy and fetal intracranial hemorrhage) [16].
Hyperemesis gravidarum is the major reason for hospitalization during the first half of pregnancy and remains the second leading cause of hospitalization throughout pregnancy [17, 18].
MANAGEMENT
Management of hyperemesis gravidarum includes adequate hydration, antiemetic medications, electrolyte replacement, vitamin supplementation, and dietary management [19, 20]. Intravenous hydration is an essential intervention aimed at fluid resuscitation and correcting fluid deficit, ketones, electrolytes deficit (primarily hypokalemia), and acid-base balance [21]. In addition, as pregnant women are in a catabolic condition, sufficient caloric requirements must be administered [22].
A. Iindications of IV fluids
Common indications of IV fluid administration in hyperemesis gravidarum are [23, 24]:
- Persistent vomiting (three or more times per 24 hours) despite antiemetic medical therapy.
- 5% or more weight loss of prepregnancy weight.
- Severe dehydration with the presence of signs and symptoms due to significant fluid loss such as fatigue, dizziness, decreased skin turgor, postural changes in blood pressure and pulse, ketonuria, electrolyte imbalance, acid-base abnormality like hypochloremic metabolic alkalosis, increased hematocrit, increased BUN to creatinine ratio and abnormal urine specific gravity.
B. Outpatient vs. inpatient IV hydration
Ambulatory (outpatient) intravenous hydration is the recommended first-line treatment for patients with severe or persistent nausea and vomiting. Multiple studies have found this treatment option to be as effective as inpatient care [25, 26].
Hospitalization is recommended if vomiting persists even after rehydration and outpatient management fails [27].
C. Selection of IV fluids
Normal saline (NS) and Ringer’s lactate are the mainstay of the management of dehydration and are equally effective in treating complications of hyperemesis gravidarum [28, 29]. Usually, Ringer’s lactate (RL) is preferred for the initial aggressive rehydration, and normal saline is used for the subsequent slower rehydration [30].
Why is Ringer’s lactate preferred for the initial aggressive rehydration and in patients of HG with severe hyponatremia?
The speed at which one rehydrates depends on the severity of their dehydration. In patients of hyperemesis gravidarum with severe dehydration, 2 liters of Ringer’s lactate is infused rapidly initially (first 1 liter RL over 2 hours followed by second 1-liter RL over 4 hours). In severe hyponatremia, avoid rapid administration of a large volume of high sodium containing normal saline (sodium 154 mEq/L), as it can lead to rapid correction of sodium levels and may cause central pontine myelinolysis [30]. Therefore in symptomatic and severe hyponatremia (serum sodium <120 mEq/L), choose low sodium containing Ringer’s lactate (130 mEq/L sodium) which carries lower risk of rapid correction of hyponatremia.
Why is normal saline preferred for the subsequently slow rehydration in and in patients of HG with less severe hyponatremia associated with hypochloremia?
For hospitalized women with hyperemesis gravidarum who are hypovolemic with minimal symptoms of hyponatremia and have serum sodium levels >120 mEq/L (low risk of rapid correction) and hypochloremia, normal saline is an appropriate choice for rehydration. Normal saline containing 154 mEq/L sodium and chloride is a preferred fluid in HG for hydration because it corrects vomiting-induced hypochloremia, hyponatremia, hypokalemia, and metabolic alkalosis effectively [31].
If hypokalemic, the woman may require potassium supplementation [12, 32]. Usually, 20 mEq/L of potassium chloride is added to either normal saline or half-normal saline (depending on the serum sodium status) and infused slowly (over 6 to 8 hours) to correct hypokalemia.
In severe hypokalemia, consider potassium replacement using one liter of normal saline with 40 mEq potassium chloride to be infused over 4–6 hours. 10 mEq of potassium per hour is a safe infusion rate if urine output is adequate.
D. Role of dextrose solutions
Avoid dextrose-containing IV fluids for the initial fluid replacement, but it may be beneficial for the subsequent IV fluid infusion. Two reasons to avoid dextrose containing IV fluids for the initial fluid replacement are [33]:
Risk of Wernicke’s encephalopathy: As thiamine (vitamin B1) deficiency occurs in about 60% of hyperemesis gravidarum patients [34], dextrose-containing IV fluids can precipitate Wernicke’s encephalopathy in such patients [10]. Supplement 100 mg of thiamine intravenously with the initial IV fluid on the first day and another 100 mg daily for the next two or three days to prevent Wernicke’s encephalopathy [25, 33, 35].
Risk of worsening of hypokalemia: Hypokalemia is a common electrolyte abnormality in hyperemesis gravidarum [16]. It is recommended to avoid using dextrose-containing solutions for initial fluid replacement, as dextrose administration stimulates insulin release, which can cause extracellular potassium to be shifted into cells and worsen hypokalemia.
After thiamine supplementation and supplementing potassium, maintain hydration with the dextrose-based solution as it fulfills the caloric requirement and helps in faster improvement of nausea [36]. In addition, evidence suggests better improvement with dextrose saline than normal saline in moderate-severe cases [37]. Finally, select 10% dextrose to provide nutritional supplementation rather than the low-calorie-containing 5% solution [38].
Continue administering IV hydration until ketosis and vitamin deficiencies are corrected, and the patient is able to tolerate oral fluids. Afterward, check and address any associated magnesium, calcium, and phosphorus deficits.
To effectively address fluid deficit with hyponatremia and hypokalemia, it is crucial to monitor the input-output chart and check the blood urea and serum electrolyte levels daily [25]. This will allow for the accurate selection of the appropriate IV fluids necessary for treatment.
FLUID THERAPY DURING NORMAL LABOR AND VAGINAL DELIVERY
INTRODUCTION
Labor is a period of prolonged and vigorous exercise for pregnant mothers. During labor, effective skeletal and smooth muscle contractions require increased energy demand. Glucose is an essential source of maternal energy, which plays an important part in the improvement of muscle performance and overcoming fatigue. Depletion of glycogen stores and fat metabolism to meet glucose demands may cause ketonemia, hypoglycemia, and acidosis. An adequate resource of glucose is needed to maintain exercise tolerance and muscle efficiency during labor. Dehydration adversely affects exercise performance and may be a factor contributing to a longer duration of labor. Providing adequate dextrose and fluids to pregnant mothers during labor can help to provide the necessary energy and hydration they need and may also lead to a faster labor process, shorter labor duration, and potentially a reduced need for oxytocin and cesarean delivery [39, 40]. To assess the hydration status, it is important to monitor urinary output and the presence or absence of ketonuria [41].
ORAL LIQUID INTAKE
Previously, the policy during active labor was “nil by mouth,” or restriction of oral intake. This policy was based on the concern that a woman may require general anesthesia for an emergency cesarean section and inhale stomach contents during surgery, leading to aspiration pneumonia [42]. However, the risk of aspiration pneumonia is very low [43], and restricting oral intake can cause dehydration and ketosis [44]. Therefore, this policy is not necessary and may cause harm to the woman [44].
Women with low complication risks and at low risk of cesarean section delivery are allowed and encouraged to consume moderate amounts of clear liquids orally during labor [45–47]. However, to avoid aspiration during uncomplicated labor, it is more important to consider how much suspended particulate matter the fluid ingested contains rather than the volume of fluid permitted to be consumed [45].
During labor, it is necessary to restrict oral intake in patients who are at high risk of aspiration (e.g., morbid obesity, diabetes mellitus, and difficult airway) or those who may need a cesarean section [45].
ORAL SOLID FOOD INTAKE
Avoiding particulate-containing fluids and solid food during active labor and delivery is the standard practice and a recommendation by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2009) and the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia (2016) [45–47]. This recommendation is because gastric emptying time is remarkably prolonged during labor.
However, the incidence of aspiration is low with current obstetric anesthesia techniques in recent literature. Therefore, solid food restriction in women at low risk of requiring general anesthesia is questioned [42, 48, 49].
Cochrane review (2013) found no evidence to support restriction to eating or drinking in women at low risk of requiring anesthesia for Cesarean section [50]. However, a recent systematic review (Ciardulli et al. 2017) of 10 randomized trials in women with a low-risk singleton (one fetus) pregnancies found that less restrictive policies resulted in a slightly shorter duration of labor [51].
PARENTERAL IV FLUIDS IN NORMAL LABOR
During normal labor, intravenous fluids are usually administered for proper hydration and to prevent prolonged labor. But as per current evidence from the Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2013), the World Health Organization (2014), and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2019), continuous IV fluid infusion is not routinely recommended in normal labor [39, 52].
Regardless of solution type, possible harmful effects to mother and newborn due to the administration of intravenous fluids during labor are:
- Discomfort, stress, and restriction in freedom of movement.
- Peripheral swelling and increased risk of fluid overload due to excessive IV fluids.
- Postpartum breast swelling and feeding issues due to the large volume of IV fluids infusion [53].
- Fetal volume expansion causes a bloated newborn at birth and greater weight loss of the newborn after birth [54, 55].
Moreover, oral food and liquids are more effective than intravenous fluids in providing energy and nutrition for the increased demand during labor [50]. Thus, instead of administering intravenous fluids to all women during labor, they should be given only to selected patients, considering their limitations and drawbacks.
Conclusion: During normal labor, avoid the “nil by mouth” policy and do not administer intravenous fluids routinely to prevent dehydration and ketosis [39, 52].
A. Indications of IV fluids during labor
When oral fluid intake is restricted, administering IV fluids in a moderate amount shortens the course of labor [39]. So the administration of IV fluid is indicated in selected pregnant mothers.
Common indications for intravenous fluid administration during labor include:
- High-risk pregnancies or restricted oral intake because of the possible need for cesarean delivery.
- Women who develop ketosis in labor [39].
- Following epidural or spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery to prevent or treat hypotension [56].
- Infusion of oxytocin for induction or augmentation of labor.
- Need to administer intravenous fluids for other clinical reasons such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, maternal exhaustion, prolonged labor, blood volume loss, and administration of antibiotics or other medications [57].
B. Type and volume of IV fluids
When IV fluids are indicated, the selection of the type, the volume, and the infusion rate of IV fluid differ on the clinical status of individual women and the anticipated duration of labor [39].
For nulliparous women who are not allowed oral intake during labor, the infusion of dextrose solution significantly reduces the total labor length without increasing the complication rate [40, 58–60].
Because of its cost-effectiveness, safety, and advantages, dextrose should be the default solute for IV fluids during labor [59, 61]. Maintenance intravenous fluid usually administered is 5% dextrose in 0.45 percent saline, normal saline, or Ringer’s lactate solution [62]. Avoid administering sodium-free 5% dextrose solution because it may cause maternal and neonatal hyponatremia and increase maternal and newborn morbidity [39].
Rate of infusion: IV fluid administration at a rate of 250 ml/hour, rather than 125 ml/hour, is associated with a shorter duration of labor and lesser need for cesarean section delivery. This data support increased hydration among nulliparous women in labor when oral intake is restricted [63].
FLUID THERAPY DURING SURGERY
PREOPERATIVE ORAL INTAKE
Liquid intake: The uncomplicated patient undergoing elective cesarean delivery may have clear liquids up to 2 hours before induction of anesthesia (American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) recommendation 2016) [45]. Consuming high-calorie carbohydrate drinks up to two hours before surgery can reduce preoperative thirst, hunger, anxiety, and the risk of dehydration in patients undergoing abdominal surgery [64, 65].
In pregnant women with a higher risk for aspiration during labor (e.g., morbid obesity, diabetes mellitus, and difficult airway), the recommendation is to restrict oral liquid intake for 6 or more hours, determined on a case-by-case basis [45].
Solid food intake: During elective surgery (e.g., planned cesarean delivery or postpartum tubal ligation) recommended fasting period for solid food is 6 to 8 hours [45].
REFERENCES
- Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, et al. William Obstetrics 24th edition 2014.
- Cheung KL, Lafayette RA. Renal Physiology of Pregnancy. Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease. 2013;20(3):209–14.
- Theunissen IM, Parer JT. Fluid and Electrolytes in Pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1994;37(1):3–15.
- Lindheimer MD, Katz AI. Sodium and Diuretics in Pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1973;288(17):891–4.
- Ueland K. Maternal Cardiovascular Hemodynamics. VII. Intrapartum Blood Volume Changes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976;126(6):671–7.
- Taylor DJ, Lind T. Red Cell Mass During and After Normal Pregnancy. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1979;86(5):364–70.
- Mashini IS, Albazzaz SJ, Fadel HE, et al. Serial noninvasive evaluation of cardiovascular hemodynamics during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;156(5):1208–1213.
- Wilson M, Morganti AA, Zervodakis I et al. Blood Pressure, the Renin-aldosterone System, and Sex Steroids Throughout Normal Pregnancy. Am J Med 1980;68(1):97–104.
- Jarnfelt-Samsioe A. Nausea and Vomiting in Pregnancy: A Review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1987;42(7):422–7.
- Jarvis S, Nelson-Piercy C. Management of Nausea and Vomiting in Pregnancy. BMJ 2011;342:d3606.
- Kallen B. Hyperemesis During Pregnancy and Delivery Outcome: A Registry Study. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 1987;26(4):291–302.
- Goodwin TM. Hyperemesis Gravidarum. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1998;41(3):597–605.
- Broussard CN, Richter JE. Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1998;27(1):123–51.
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin Summary No. 153: Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(3):687–688.
- MacGibbon KW, Fejzo MS, Mullin PM. Mortality Secondary to Hyperemesis Gravidarum: A Case Report. Womens Health Gynecol 2015;1(2):011.
- London V, Grube S, Sherer DM, et al. Hyperemesis Gravidarum: A review of recent literature. Pharmacology 2017;100(3–4):161–171.
- Gazmararian JA, Petersen R, Jamieson DJ, et al. Hospitalizations During Pregnancy Among Managed Care Enrollees. Obstet. Gynecol. 2002;100(1):94–100.
- Poursharif B, Korst LM, Fejzo MS, et al. The psychosocial burden of hyperemesis gravidarum. J Perinatol. 2008;28(3):176–181.
- Bottomley C, Bourne T. Management Strategies for Hyperemesis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009;23(4):549–64.
- Tan PC, Omar SZ. Contemporary approaches to hyperemesis during pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2011;23(2):87–93.
- Bustos M, Venkataramanan R, Caritis S. Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy - what’s new? Auton Neurosci Basic Clin. 2017;202:62–72.
- Tamay AG, Kuscu NK. Hyperemesis Gravidarum: Current Aspect. J Obstet Gynaecol 2011;31(8):708–712.
- Intravenous (IV) Hydration Therapy for Hyperemesis Gravidarum. HMSA 2015.
- Liu C, Zhao G, Qiao D, et al. Emerging Progress in Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy and Hyperemesis Gravidarum: Challenges and Opportunities. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;8:809270.
- The Management of Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy and Hyperemesis Gravidarum. RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 69. June 2016.
- Mitchell-Jones N, Farren JA, Tobias A, et al. Ambulatory versus inpatient management of severe nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: a randomised control trial with patient preference Arm BMJ Open 2017;7(12):e017566.
- Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, et al. Chapter 54: Gastrointestinal Disorders, Williams Obstetrics, 25 2018 McGraw-Hill Education.
- Rao A. Hyperemesis Gravidarum in Pregnancy. Intrapartum NICE Guidelines August 2016.
- Adibah I, Khursiah D, Ahmad AI, et al. Hartman’s solution or normal saline in the treatment of hyperemesis gravidarum among south east asian population: a randomised controlled trial”. International Medical Journal 2008;7:2.
- Deb S. NHS Guidelines on Management of Hyperemesis Gravidarum. 2017.
- Guideline for Management and Treatment of Hyperemesis Gravidarum. Initiated By: Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board Gynaecology Forum. Date Approved: 28th July 2022. Available from: https://wisdom.nhs.wales/health-board-guidelines/cwm-taf-gynaecology-file/hyperemesisctm-guideline-august-2022pdf/ [Accessed March 23, 2023].
- Morantz C, Torrey B. Practice Guideline Briefs. Am Fam Physician 2004;70:601–02.
- Chiossi G, Neri I, Cavazzuti M, et al. Hyperemesis gravidarum complicated by wernicke encephalopathy: background, case report, and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2006;61(4):255–68.
- Van Stuijvenberg ME, Schabort I, Labadarios D, et al. The nutritional status and treatment of patients with hyperemesis gravidarum. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172(5):1585–91.
- Giugale LE, Young OM, Streitman DC. Iatrogenic wernicke encephalopathy in a patient with severe hyperemesis gravidarum. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125(5):1150–1152.
- Tan P, Norazilah MJ, Omar SZ. Dextrose saline compared with normal saline rehydration of hyperemesis gravidarum; a randomized controlled trial Obstet Gynaecol 2013;121(2 Pt 1):291–298.
- McParlin C, O’Donnell A, Robson SC, et al. Treatments for Hyperemesis Gravidarum and Nausea and Vomiting in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review. JAMA. 2016;316(13):1392–1401.
- Fejzo MS, Trovik J, Grooten IJ, et al. Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy and hyperemesis gravidarum. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5(1):62.
- Dawood F, Dowswell T, Quenby S. intravenous fluids for reducing the duration of labour in low risk nulliparous women. The Cochrane Data Base of Systematic Reviews. 2013(6):CD007715.
- Movahed F, Pakniat H, Ataee, M, et al. Normal saline and dextrose-saline infusion comparison in the duration of active phase in nulliparous Women. Biotech Health Sci. 2015;2(4):e31666.
- ACOG Committee Opinion No. 766: Approaches to limit intervention during labor and birth. February 2019;133(2):e164–e173.
- Sperling JD, Dahlke JD, Sibai BM. Restriction of oral intake during labor: whither are we bound? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;214(5):592–6.
- Robinson M, Davidson A. Aspiration Under Anaesthesia: Risk Assessment and Decision-Making. Cont Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2014;14(4):171–175.
- Ozkan SA, Kadioglu M, Rathfisch G. Restricting oral fluid and food intake during labor: a qualitative analysis of women’s views. International Journal of Caring Sciences. 2017;10(1):235–242.
- Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia: An updated report by the american society of anesthesiologists task force on obstetric anesthesia and the society for obstetric anesthesia and perinatology. Anesthesiology, 2016;124(2):270–300.
- ACOG Committee Opinion No. 441: Oral Intake During Labor. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114(3):714.
- O’Sullivan G, Scrutton M. NPO During Labor. Is there any scientific validation? Anesthesiol Clin North America 2003;21(1):87–98.
- WHO Recommendation on Oral Fluid and Food Intake During Labor, For Women At Low Risk (May 2014). The WHO Reproductive Health Library; Geneva: World Health Organization.
- Lee L, Dy J, Azzam H. Practice Guidelines for the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada: Management of Spontaneous Labor at Term in Healthy Women J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2016;38(9):843–865.
- Singata M, Tranmer J, Gyte GM. Restricting Oral Fluid and Food Intake During Labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013;2013(8):CD003930.
- Ciardulli A, Saccone G, Anastasio H, et al. Less-Restrictive Food Intake During Labor in Low-Risk Singleton Pregnancies A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Obstet Gynecol 2017;129(3):473–80.
- WHO Recommendation on the Use of Intravenous Fluids with the Aim of Shortening the Duration of Labor (May 2014). The WHO Reproductive Health Library; Geneva: World Health Organization.
- Kujawa-Myles S, Noel-Weiss J, Dunn S, et al. Maternal intravenous fluids and postpartum breast changes: a pilot observational study. Int Breastfeed J. 2015;10(1):18.
- Watson J, Hodnett E, Armson BA, et al. A randomized controlled trial of effect of intrapartum intravenous fluid management on breastfed newborn weight loss. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2012;41(1):24–32.
- Noel-Weiss J, Woodend AK, Peterson WE, et al. An observational study of associations among maternal fluids during parturition, neonatal output, and breastfed newborn weight loss. Int Breastfeed J 2011;6:9.
- Hofmeyr GJ, Cyna A, Middleton P. Prophylactic Intravenous Preloading for Regional Analgesia in Labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;11(4):CD000175.
- Rebecca Dekker. Evidence on: IV Fluids During Labor. May 31 2017 https://evidencebasedbirth.com/iv-fluids-during-labor/.
- Swidan KH, Abou-gamrah AA, Abdel Shafy A, et al. Effect of Normal Saline Infusion versus Dextrose 5% Infusion on The Duration of Labor in Nulliparous Women: Randomized Controlled Trial. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2017;68(3):1452–1461.
- Paré J, Pasquier JC, Lewin A, et al. Reduction of total labor length through the addition of parenteral dextrose solution in induction of labor in nulliparous: results of DEXTRONS prospective randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017;216(5):508.e1–508.e7.
- Yulghunlu FA, Shafaie FS, Mirghafourvand M, et al. The effects of intravenous Dextrose 5%, Ringer’s Solution, and oral intake on the duration of labor stages in nulliparous women: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2020;33(2):289–296.
- Shrivastava VK, Garite TJ, Jenkins SM, et al. A Randomized, Double-blinded, Controlled Trial Comparing Parenteral Normal Saline with and without Dextrose on the Course of Labor in Nulliparous. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200(4):379.e1–6.
- Funai EF, Norwitz ER, et al. Management of Normal Labor and Delivery. UptoDate Mar 07, 2019.
- Ehsanipoor RM, Saccone G, Seligman NS, et al. Intravenous fluid rate for reduction of cesarean delivery rate in nulliparous women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2017;96(7):804–811.
- Hausel J, Nygren J, Lagerkranser M, et al. A carbohydrate-rich drink reduces preoperative discomfort in elective surgery patients. Anesth Analg. 2001;93(5):1344–50.
- Singh JP. Preoperative oral carbohydrate drink improves surgical outcome. 2018;6(2):72–73.